Dieser Artikel unserer neuen feministische studien Bloggerin Claire Potter erschien ursprünglich Arguments For Gay Marraige Juni auf outhistory. This article by the latest feministische studien blogger Claire Potter originally appeared on June 28th at outhistory. I am not sure that the recent decision in Obergefell v. Hodges is a victory for love, which is often such a fickle emotion. Nor am I sure that it is a victory for respectability, or the children who need far more than respectability to thrive. But I am sure that it is a victory for equal rights, and that it offers an opportunity for our queer political community to move on other social justice issues. Marriage was never the be all and end all of perfect equality, as mainstream media and LGBTQ advocacy organizations would have it. However it was a clear sign of unequal citizenship, and a suppression of our right to have the families we want to have in the ways we want to have them. Or, I will add, to not have them if we so choose, and say why. LGBTQ academics who are vigorously anti-marriage might want to chew on this one as they take to Facebook to predict the End of Days: when it is actually a choice not to marry — to be plurally committed, to be polyamorous, to be domestically organized outside monogamous legal bounds — how much more powerful is that as a statement of your sexual politics? They were cynical campaigns of terror against all LGBT people, and they were a form of voter fraud that sapped the energy of progressive organizers and required extensive disinformation. In response to this propaganda, activists dug in, and so did historians, writing a range of wonderful books that exposed official homophobia for what it is: unequal citizenship and an offense to the Constitution. Thus, the decision in Obergefell is not only a victory for the lawyers, it is a victory of good history over bad history. Trigger warning, if you Arguments For Gay Marraige sweeping scholarly generalizations traumatic: you will also see bad history and selective history on both sides of the case, a continual frustration for me even when I read SCOTUS decisions that I like. The histories of gender, sexuality and feminism are far more complicated than those Obergefell has employed, something we need to keep in mind as we celebrate this milestone. Marriage is right for some people and not for others, but the Arguments For Gay Marraige demonstrates that it is far from a uniquely perfect way for people to organize their lives. All sorts of people, across time and space, have been differently married, happily unmarried, or have privileged different forms of social organization over monogamous marriage. Some people function within systems in which arranged marriage, not romance, dominate the process of creating a family. The unmarried or plurally married have often viewed many still do these domestic arrangements as crucial to their personal dignity a keyword of Arguments For Gay Marraige and to their right to free expression. Well educated conservatives can do better than that. Are LGBT folk likely to do better at marriage than straight people? Has love won the day? Probably not: love is one of the more changeable emotions, a marriage destroyer as well as a marriage creator. Will children in LGBT families feel more secure? Some will, perhaps, but they would be wise to keep a suitcase packed all the same just in case. Anyone who studies the history of childhood, or who has ever seen a joint custody agreement play out in real time, knows that co-parenting after a divorce, even when custody is not contested, is an economic and emotional challenge. For decades, achieving gay rights has been a process of accepting half-measures, concessions and small victories while I prepare to be kicked in the face every time a SCOTUS decision or a hateful anti-marriage ballot measure is pending. Structural inequalities need to be rectified wherever we identify them, and full citizenship rights are not to be sneezed at. Critics who are angry at the amount of queer funding that Obergefell consumed have a point. To presume that crucial and underdressed issues — homelessness, poverty, health care, and the plight of queer youth — could be rectified as full citizenship rights Arguments For Gay Marraige LGBTQ people as a whole were being retracted strikes me as fundamentally misguided, impractical and wrong. Getting the government out of the business of official homophobia is another important outcome of Obergefell : a new half-hour documentary, Uniquely Nasty: the U. By journalist Michael Issikoff and produced by Yahoo Viewfinder, it is available free on line. It will be particularly interesting if you are a political historian: the film begins with George W. Bush committing to gays in his party and then throwing them under the bus by using bans on same-sex marriage as a cynical get out the vote strategy. Finally, the Interactive Timeline we prepared on Marriage and Marriage Resisters in LGBTQ history is immediately relevant to debates between those who uncritically applaud the opening of marriage to all, those who have always opposed gay marriage, and everyone in between. This exhibit also includes the amicus briefs filed by the American Historical Association and the Organization of American Historians on behalf of marriage equality. Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Meinen Namen, meine E-Mail-Adresse und meine Website in diesem Browser für die nächste Kommentierung speichern. Benachrichtige mich über nachfolgende Kommentare via E-Mail. Benachrichtige mich über neue Beiträge via E-Mail.
GAY MARRIAGE
Counter Claim Article | PDF | Same Sex Marriage | Homosexuality Same-sex marriage is not the only civil rights issue impacting the gay community. Although. Another argument against gay marriage holds that procreation is one of the pur- poses of marriage and that this purpose could not be reached by gay. Marriage Equality, Workplace Inequality: The Next Gay Rights Battle. Gay Marriage: By: Tina Chen g | PDF | Social ScienceGay Marriage: For Better Or for Worse? Are LGBT folk likely to do better at marriage than straight people? Teja Marketing vs. Miriam Palma Defensor Santiago. Fachgebiete Geschichte der Soziologie Sozialwissenschaften Soziologie.
Account Options
B gay marriage · B Gay couples Legal status, laws, etc · Description · Staff Argument Against Same-Sex Marriage by: Anderson, Erik A. Published: (). Although. No, but that isn't what the Constitution requires of anybody. Has love won. Same-sex marriage is not the only civil rights issue impacting the gay community. Marriage Equality, Workplace Inequality: The Next Gay Rights Battle. Are LGBT folk likely to do better at marriage than straight people? Another argument against gay marriage holds that procreation is one of the pur- poses of marriage and that this purpose could not be reached by gay.Amy Adamczyk. The Imaginary Marriage Consensus Erfordert eine Authentifizierung Nicht lizenziert Lizenziert PDF downloaden. LGBT Powerpoint Dokument 50 Seiten. Parenthood is a benefit of marriage and same sex couples cannot have children by themselves. Spelling Bee Dokument 1 Seite. Corcuera PRO: Same Sex Marriage The question of whether gay marriages should be legalized has been increasingly asked over the last few years. Acceptance of Same Sex Marriage Dokument 2 Seiten. Jury Tampering Letter 7. Doriane Lambelet Coleman. Legalization recognizes reality: there are gay people, they love each other and they want to commit to each other through marriage in the same way as straight couples. Trogon Dokument 9 Seiten. Thus, the decision in Obergefell is not only a victory for the lawyers, it is a victory of good history over bad history. Embedded Journalism: Global Media Scenario Tejaswini Semester 3, Section C. Trans PTT Dokument 43 Seiten. RIVERA, Armina Nicole C. New York, USA: New York University Press; Teller V Dogge Dokument 10 Seiten. They provide a cogent analysis of conservative arguments that same-sex matrimony threatens conventional marriage, and argue persuasively that enabling same-sex partners to marry may actually strengthen that beleaguered institution. Oxford University Press Amazon. In doing so, he helps us to understand why resistance to gay marriage remains steadfast, even in the face of growing consensus. Zitieren Sie dieses Buch. Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen Community Problem Report Dokument 7 Seiten. Finally, the Interactive Timeline we prepared on Marriage and Marriage Resisters in LGBTQ history is immediately relevant to debates between those who uncritically applaud the opening of marriage to all, those who have always opposed gay marriage, and everyone in between. Same-Sex Marriage and Equal Rights: Andrea Blome English Monday P. Diese Webseite verwendet Cookies. Petitions, Education, Donation Dokument 9 Seiten. Ulla Wischermann Ute Gerhard — Mitbegründerin der feministischen studien. Opponents of same-sex marriage in the United States claim that allowing gays and lesbians to marry would undermine the institution of marriage, weaken family structures, and cause harm to children. Heterosexuality Dokument 3 Seiten. Chapter 1 - Meaning of Marriage Family Dokument 57 Seiten. Miriam Palma Defensor Santiago. Oral A Legal Technique and Logic Dokument 15 Seiten. Gay Marriage Thesis Statement Dokument 11 Seiten. Frontmatter Öffentlich zugänglich PDF downloaden. Dimayacyac Dokument 6 Seiten. Marshalling insights from historical data, national surveys, and in-depth interviews, Peter Hart-Brinson skillfully and convincingly documents the powerful role of generations in effecting change.
